Loading...
Fetching results...
0 items found

P08: A comparison of job satisfaction, depression severity and quality of life between perioperative nurses who take part robot-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgery

Speaker
Ms. D.N. (Dilara Nur) Turgut
Authors

Turgut D.N., Palta A., Tektas M., Balci M., Guzel O., Aslan Y., Tuncel A. 

Institutions

Ankara City Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Ankara, Turkey 

Event
21st International Meeting of the European Association of Urology Nurses
Date – Time - Location
04 September 2021, 10:30 - 11:30, Virtual room 2
Session
Abstract Session 1 - Abstract presentations
Topic
Practice-development oriented abstract

Introduction & Objectives

The rapid introduction of technological developments into healthcare system has created new challenges for perioperative nurses. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgeries affect the physical and interpersonal context of the surgical teams work and subsequent patient results. The main objective of this study was compare job satisfaction, depression severity and quality of life scores of perioperative nurses who take part in robotic-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgeries.

Materials & Methods

A total of 101 perioperative nurses who take part on a robotic-assisted laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgeries in 6 different centres were included. All the participants were asked to fill Minnesota Job Satisfaction Questionnaire (MJSQ) (Intrinsic Job Satisfaction and extrinsic Job Satisfaction), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and SF-36 Questionnaire.

Results

The demographic data of the participants were summarized in Table 1. Demographic parameters similar between the groups. A total scores of BDI and SF-36 Questionnaire were similar between the groups. We did not find significant difference between the groups in terms of the total score of MJSQ. Intrinsic Job Satisfaction sub-score of MJSQ was similar between the groups. However, Extrinsic Job Satisfaction sub-score of MJSQ was better in robotic group. The results were summarized in Table 2.


Table 1. The demographic data of the participants.
Parameters Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Pure laparoscopic p
   Age (year) 35.1±7.5 34.6±6.4 0.742*
Gender (n) Female 41 40 0.961*
Male 10 10
Working duration
(n)
1-4 year 11 6 0.552*
5-10 year 9 12
>10 year 31 32
Education level
(n)
High School 4 8 0.205*
University 47 42
Marital status 
(n)
Single 21 20 0.904*
Married 30 30
* student’s T-test

Table 2. Results.
SURVEYS Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Pure laparoscopic p
MJSQ Total score 62.1±14 56.8±15 0.080*
Intrinsic job satisfaction 
sub-score
38.7±9.8 37.1±10.7 0.450*
Extrinsic job satisfaction 
sub-score
23.1±6.4 19.6±5.6 0.004*
BDI Total Score 14.8±8.9 13.02±9.4 0.329*
SF-36 QoL Physical functioning 81.08±17.2 83.2±18.9 0.556*
Physical limitation 49.5±34.8 51.5±36.6 0.819*
Emotional limitation 51.6±40 49.9±32.6 0.819*
Levels of energy-fatique 48.1±20.4 51.5±18.6 0.389*
Emotional 
well-being
56.2±18.4 59±18.9 0.451*
Social functioning 65±20.3 64.1±21.4 0.821*
Bodily Pain 61.7±22.9 69.7±22.9 0.080*
General health 56.4±16.1 61.5±18.1 0.136*
*student’s T-test
⸆ Significant

Conclusions

Our results show that general job satisfaction, depression severity and Quality of Life level were similar between perioperative nurses who take part in robotic assisted-laparoscopic and pure laparoscopic surgeries. According to our results, perioperative nurses who work with robotic surgery team had better aspects of the work situation than the pure laparoscopic group. The difference may link to impression of high-tech equipment such as robot in their job experience.

  • © 2023 European Association of Urology
  • Disclaimer